State the purpose
Tell collaborators whether they should view, comment, edit or approve.
E-Learning Officer interview portfolio · concept prototype
An end-to-end demonstration of how specialist workshop content can become accessible, interactive and maintainable asynchronous learning for doctoral researchers.
Why I built this: to demonstrate how I would support a multi-institutional graduate school by turning subject expertise into effective online learning—not by replacing it.
Independent prototype using fictional scenarios. No university branding, learner data or restricted material.
The role, interpreted
The Subject Matter Expert owns specialist accuracy. The E-Learning Officer creates the conditions in which that expertise becomes useful online: co-designing outcomes, planning capture, editing media, adding practice, assuring accessibility, publishing well and improving over time.
01 · Learner experience
A compact, scenario-led micro-module for doctoral researchers working across organisational boundaries.
Step 1 of 4
Cross-institution collaboration works best when everyone knows where the current version lives, who can access it and what must not be shared.
Choose a proportionate, accessible sharing approach for a collaborative research document.
02 · Production view
The learner sees five minutes. The production record makes the resource accurate, accessible, findable and maintainable.
Confirm audience, purpose and fit with the training programme.
Agree outcomes, scope and responsibilities with the Subject Matter Expert.
Plan consent, slides, audio, interaction and recording conditions.
Edit, chunk and add practice, reflection and accessible alternatives.
Complete academic, technical, accessibility, copyright and style checks.
Add metadata, upload, test learner access and archive source files.
Review feedback, analytics, support requests and scheduled updates.
Subject Matter Expert (SME) partnership
Before production begins, align purpose, audience, outcome, evidence, permissions and sign-off.
Quality assurance
LMS-ready record
Evaluation
Confidence and learner need
Completion, responses and drop-off
Usefulness, accessibility and relevance
Application and community connection
Compare patterns and improve
Governance and trust
Every resource needs named accountability for academic accuracy, accessibility, permissions, confidentiality, publication and review. Welsh-language provision should be planned from the outset and reviewed by an appropriately fluent Welsh-language professional.
Respect permissions. Confirm consent, copyright, confidentiality and appropriate access before publication.
Name accountability. Record who owns academic accuracy, production, approval and future review.
Assure before publishing. Complete human academic, accessibility, language, editorial and technical checks.
A synced walkthrough of the e-learning proof of concept. Press play to run the narrated tour with light captions. Record this window at 1080p for a clean take.